eCommons

 

Divergent Strategies: Edison Gardens and Tacolcy Economic Development Corporation, Miami, Florida

dc.contributor.authorVon Hoffman, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T01:57:14Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T01:57:14Z
dc.date.issued2002-07-01
dc.description.abstractEditors Note: Urban redevelopment has seen a dramatic revitalization in the last two decades, especially with the creation of Community Development Corporations (CDCs) and HOPE IV. Unfortunately, successful development in Urban environments are still more the exception then the rule. While many major cities have seen a dramatic revitalization of their urban cores, the creation of low and moderate income housing solutions have dramatically lagged the overall booming housing market Many of the failures of CDCs to successfully develop can be traced directly to the long standing complaint that the funding process is too lengthy and too complicated. In addition the entire process is often bogged down in the capricious administration of government funding programs. In the following case study Alexander von Hoffman discuses many of the issues that confronted a CDC operating in Miami.
dc.description.legacydownloads2002_8_22_Mills.pdf: 322 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
dc.identifier.other5726483
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/70585
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCornell Real Estate Review
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectCornell
dc.subjectreal estate
dc.subjectEconomic Development Corporation
dc.subjectMiami
dc.subjectFlorida
dc.subjecturban development
dc.subjectcommunity development
dc.subjectLocal Initiatives Support Corporation
dc.titleDivergent Strategies: Edison Gardens and Tacolcy Economic Development Corporation, Miami, Florida
dc.typearticle
local.authorAffiliationVon Hoffman, Alexander: Joint Center for Housing Studies
schema.issueNumberVol. 1

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2002_8_22_Mills.pdf
Size:
1.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format