Library

eCommons

 

When Private Property Rights Collide With Growth Management Legislation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCalandrillo, Steve P.
dc.contributor.authorDeliganis, Chryssa V.
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T19:34:55Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T19:34:55Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.description.abstractOver the past century, ever-expanding urban and suburban growth in the United States has offered a clear sign of America’s economic vitality, but it has not come without unique challenges of its own. Indeed, efforts to promulgate “smart growth” legislation as an antidote to suburban “sprawl” have proliferated in the past three decades, but it is time we ask ourselves whether their benefits outweigh their unintended consequences. States and local governments that once enthusiastically touted such legislation are beginning to confront unforeseen obstacles – and litigation – that raise the need for immediate reform. This Article explores the impact of growth management acts on preexisting property rights, noting the inevitable and growing conflicts between the two sides that legislatures (and courts) are increasingly being forced to confront. We assess the problems with creating truly intelligent urban and suburban growth, from political pressures to inconsistent judicial determinations to NIMBYs to constitutional takings jurisprudence.
dc.description.legacydownloadsCalandrillo.pdf: 677 downloads, before Aug. 1, 2020.
dc.identifier.other7161558
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/70757
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsRequired Publisher Statement: © Cornell University. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectCornell
dc.subjectreal estate
dc.subjectsmart growth
dc.subjectsuburban sprawl
dc.subjectsprawl
dc.subjectstate government
dc.subjectlocal government
dc.subjectintelligent growth
dc.subjectplanning
dc.subjectNIMBYism
dc.subjectNIMBY
dc.subjectgrowth management
dc.subjectgrowth management legislation
dc.subjectmunicipal zoning
dc.subjectAmerican Dream
dc.subjectBelle Terre decision
dc.subjectEuclid v. Amber Realty
dc.subjectzoning
dc.subjectland values
dc.subjectland use segregation
dc.subjectpopulation density
dc.subjectsuburban development
dc.subjecttransit-oriented development
dc.subjectmixed-use infill
dc.subjectPhoenix
dc.subjectCityScape
dc.subjectHawaii
dc.subjectVermont
dc.subjectOregon
dc.subjectFLorida
dc.subjectMaine
dc.subjectRhode Island
dc.subjectGeorgia
dc.subjectWashington
dc.subjectMaryland
dc.subjectPennsylvania
dc.subjectDelaware
dc.subjectTennessee
dc.subjectColorado
dc.subjecturban growth boundaries
dc.subjectOregon Land Use Planning Program
dc.subjectLand Conservation and Development Corporation
dc.subjectLCDC
dc.subjectLand Use Board of Appeals
dc.subjectLUBA
dc.subjectUGB
dc.subjectRajneeshpuram
dc.subjectOregon Supreme Court
dc.subjectTom McCall
dc.subjectChesapeake Bay
dc.subjectPriority Funding Areas
dc.subjectPFA
dc.subjectMinnesota
dc.subjecturban service areas
dc.subjectenterprise zones
dc.subjectNew Jersey
dc.subject2020 plan
dc.subjectVirginia
dc.subjectLoudoun County
dc.subjectHorse Country
dc.subjectDulles International Airport
dc.subjectWashington Dulles
dc.subjectLeesburg
dc.subjectWest Virginia
dc.subjectcommuters
dc.subjectconstitutional takings
dc.subjectjurisprudence
dc.subjectPenn Central
dc.subjecteconomic impact
dc.subjectleapfrogging growth
dc.subjectviking properties v. holm
dc.subjectClean Air Act
dc.subjectClean Water Act
dc.subjectEndangered Species Act
dc.subjectNational Environmental Policy Act
dc.subjectNational Land Use Planning Act
dc.subjectprivate property rights reform
dc.titleWhen Private Property Rights Collide With Growth Management Legislation
dc.typearticle
local.authorAffiliationCalandrillo, Steve P.: University of Washington School of Law
schema.issueNumberVol.13

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Calandrillo.pdf
Size:
365.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

CRER Vol. 13 (2015)