Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBruce, Thomas R.
dc.contributor.authorHillmann, Diane I.
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-08T19:54:30Z
dc.date.available2007-07-08T19:54:30Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationIn Metadata in Practice, D. Hillmann & E Westbrooks, eds.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0-8389-0882-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1813/7895
dc.description.abstractLike pornography, metadata quality is difficult to define. We know it when we see it, but conveying the full bundle of assumptions and experience that allow us to identify it is a different matter. For this reason, among others, few outside the library community have written about defining metadata quality. Still less has been said about enforcing quality in ways that do not require unacceptable levels of human effort.en_US
dc.format.extent117248 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/msword
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherALA Editionsen_US
dc.subjectmetadata qualityen_US
dc.titleThe Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploitingen_US
dc.typebook chapteren_US
schema.accessibilityFeaturestructuralNavigation
schema.accessibilityFeaturetaggedPDF
schema.accessibilityHazardnone
schema.accessibilitySummaryReader note: This document was created from the originally submitted version. The original appears to be a working draft and included numbered placeholders for footnotes that were never completed. These placeholders have been replaced with the text "(incomplete footnote)."


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Statistics